
Sifu Glenn Hairston demonstrates Punching Tai Chi style www.internaldamagetaichi.com
Video Rating: 4 / 5
May
07

Sifu Glenn Hairston demonstrates Punching Tai Chi style www.internaldamagetaichi.com
Video Rating: 4 / 5
25 comments
No ping yet
bmckungfu says:
May 7, 2011 at 7:38 am (UTC 0)
thats not bad… good work
timesente says:
May 7, 2011 at 8:09 am (UTC 0)
@hettk
lol..
hettk says:
May 7, 2011 at 9:00 am (UTC 0)
XD if i was the guy in black i would wont to hit him back
formlessfighter says:
May 7, 2011 at 9:20 am (UTC 0)
@jgq85 I don’t but it will be on a upcoming (Informal Tai Chi Series) DVD
formlessfighter says:
May 7, 2011 at 9:21 am (UTC 0)
@FredoFreedom Actuall I didn’t just through study of Taiji as my Teacher taught.
FredoFreedom says:
May 7, 2011 at 10:14 am (UTC 0)
Looks great! Thank you. Did you do any other gi-gung like I-Chuan to develop this?
thinkofsomethincleva says:
May 7, 2011 at 10:56 am (UTC 0)
All of you talking crap…I guarantee you this guy would knock you on your ass, haha.
jgq85 says:
May 7, 2011 at 11:09 am (UTC 0)
@whoflungdat
Do you have a video upload of how it’s done?
whoflungdat says:
May 7, 2011 at 11:13 am (UTC 0)
@xXmRecePmXx you have no idea
whoflungdat says:
May 7, 2011 at 11:19 am (UTC 0)
@TheZhongzheng Hi I am referring to a punch which will always have a circular movement due to the power being issued by the waist. Any movement that initiated by the waist can’t be linear and should contain a spiral and you are correct Taiji does contain linear movement
regards.
TheZhongzheng says:
May 7, 2011 at 11:30 am (UTC 0)
@whoflungdat A Tai Chi technique must involve circle and focus, Tai Chi contains both circular and linear movement, there has to be both.
hobofu says:
May 7, 2011 at 11:41 am (UTC 0)
@whoflungdat totally agree with you mate
AmericanPowerBase says:
May 7, 2011 at 12:12 pm (UTC 0)
Excellent treatise on the power of jing!
catstalker1 says:
May 7, 2011 at 12:23 pm (UTC 0)
The punch must not be to effective, he hit that guy several times and he’s still standing. My punch he would have been flying across the room.
Ryooken says:
May 7, 2011 at 12:45 pm (UTC 0)
I will chime in here. What ramcity is talking about is the internal power in the tai chi strikes, what he is saying is correct. If you don’t believe what he says then I suggest you do the technique slowly. Tai Chi chuan works whether slow or fast. That punch he used in the video can be demonstrated at any rate of speed without losing it’s effectiveness. That’s what internal power does.
kidxangai says:
May 7, 2011 at 1:16 pm (UTC 0)
wrong punch -.-
just see chinese masters and students punching.
kidxangai says:
May 7, 2011 at 1:29 pm (UTC 0)
wrong punch -.-
just see chinese masters and students punching.
GetDamage says:
May 7, 2011 at 1:47 pm (UTC 0)
This is probably the best explanation on tai chi punching that I’ve seen. I wonder if this punch can generate even more force if it added foot pivot from boxing (maybe that’s what Bruce Lee did?), and the 45 degree angle step and follow through from muay thai? The other teachers also mentioned something about sinking that looks like how a boxer lower his stance to generate more power into his strike. I think it would be amazing to watch you work the heavy bag demonstrating the different strikes.
Ballroomshen says:
May 7, 2011 at 2:44 pm (UTC 0)
Tai Chi — Okay, that style is before Taiji is born.
VNPrince says:
May 7, 2011 at 3:16 pm (UTC 0)
explosivee
xXmRecePmXx says:
May 7, 2011 at 3:29 pm (UTC 0)
woflungdat=nooob
ReillyVids says:
May 7, 2011 at 3:47 pm (UTC 0)
Agreed… whoflungdat is an idiot and arguing with idiots is pointless. To talk is easy when it comes to fighting… he should put up a video showing how its done or shut up.
goodforthemoney says:
May 7, 2011 at 4:25 pm (UTC 0)
whoflungdat, sorry but it seems that you are the one who can’t see everything, this man;s punches look very relaxed and powerfull.
whoflungdat says:
May 7, 2011 at 4:49 pm (UTC 0)
yep your right there, no point wasting anymore time.
good luck
ramcity says:
May 7, 2011 at 5:13 pm (UTC 0)
Like I said before. This conversation is pointless.